| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2301 - 2305 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Devasya vs V. K.Sasi regarding eviction from shop room

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P 100/2020

Kozhikode

2025-02-24

approximately-4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Asokan.A vs M.P.Rajeev regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.103/2024

Kozhikode

2025-02-24

approximately-1 year 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between N.P.Shamsudheen vs Safreena.N.P et al regarding partition.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 436/2018

Kozhikode

2025-02-25

approximately-6 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Padmini vs Yasodha P regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 774/2015

Kozhikode

2025-02-28

approximately-9 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Girija et al vs Komalam et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 825/2016

Kozhikode

2025-02-28

approximately-8 years 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Numerous petitions were dismissed for failing to pay necessary court fees and batta.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence proving respondents' financial capability to pay debts.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs failed to take necessary procedural steps, leading to multiple dismissals for non-action in cases.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Default Due to Absence of Petitioner

Petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence in court during hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Default Due to Absence of Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?