| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2201 - 2205 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between K.C.Chandran et al vs Sudha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.92/2024

Kozhikode

2025-04-04

approximately-1 year 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Moideenkutty Haji vs Chandran regarding eviction of shoproom

Rent Control

R C P No. 53/2023

Kozhikode

2025-04-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M. V. Muhammed vs Mr. P. M. Navas regarding eviction

Rent Control Petition

R C P No.69/2022

Kozhikode

2025-04-04

approximately-1 year 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pandikasala Niyas vs Jamsheer.V regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control

EP No. 150/2025

Kozhikode

2025-04-07

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Cut Man Gents Beauty Parlour et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.429/2024

Kozhikode

2025-04-05

approximately-5 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to provide necessary documents to support their claims or petitions.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Many plaintiffs did not pay required fees or batta, leading to dismissal of their cases.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

The absence of plaintiffs in court proceedings resulted in dismissals for numerous cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present adequate evidence supporting their claims or financial means.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Documents

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of Petitioners

Lack of Evidence Submitted

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?