| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1956 - 1960 of 21901

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s P.T. Ply vs Mr. Devarajan regarding realization of money

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 09/2024

Kozhikode

2025-12-19

approximately-4 years 10 months 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunhikoya Haji vs Vasu regarding arrears of rent and eviction

Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition. No. 17/2024

Kozhikode

2025-12-19

approximately-2 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs SHAMSUDHEEN.A.K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 583/2025

Kozhikode

2025-12-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Afsal.A.T vs Jameela et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 749/2022

Kozhikode

2025-12-20

approximately-3 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Feroke Nidhi Limited vs Anoop regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 546/2025

Kozhikode

2025-12-20

approximately-3 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9649

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff frequently failed to pay necessary court fees or batta, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of evidence to demonstrate financial means or other necessary proof resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Many plaintiffs did not take required actions like issuing notices or filing documents, causing default dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Plaintiffs' absence or failure to represent their cases at court led to multiple dismissals for default.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?