| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18231 - 18235 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secretary vs Muhammed Hassan Poozhithara et al regarding EP 13/2019

Execution Petition

KLML130000392019

Malappuram

2019-07-27

0 years, 6 months, 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Yogakshema Sabha vs C.Saidalavi regarding EP 23/2018

KLML130000732018

Malappuram

2019-07-27

1 years, 6 months, 5 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M. Rajan vs Kalyani Gunasekharan regarding EP dismissal

Execution Petition

EP 255/2018

Malappuram

2019-07-29

0 years, 8 months, 14 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Dr. Senthilkumar regarding Offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T.No:12/2018

Tirur

2019-07-27

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vijaya Bank vs Saraswathy.P. regarding money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 292 OF 2018

2019-07-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple cases dismissed because plaintiffs failed to pay mandatory batta fees required for processing petitions.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Necessary Documentation

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present essential documents, leading to case dismissals due to insufficient evidence.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notice to Respondents

Dismissing petitions for plaintiffs' inability to properly issue notices to all necessary parties involved in the case.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Many cases dismissed due to the plaintiffs' no-shows in court, demonstrating lack of engagement in their proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Necessary Documentation

Failure to Issue Notice to Respondents

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?