| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18151 - 18155 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Thilakavathi et al vs Leelavathi et al regarding property delivery.

Execution Petition

EP 81/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-07-09

0 years, 4 months, 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Thami et al regarding decree satisfaction

Civil Suit

EP 266/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-07-09

0 years, 7 months, 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Prasad regarding EP dismissal

Execution Petition

EP 267/2018

Malappuram

2019-07-09

0 years, 7 months, 24 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between secratary vs Muhammed Ashraf et al regarding execution petition.

Execution Petition

EP 399/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-07-09

0 years, 6 months, 19 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratry vs Muahmmed Ashraf et al regarding EP dismissal

Execution Petition

EP 401/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-07-10

0 years, 6 months, 20 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often didn't provide essential documents needed to support their claims, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed when plaintiffs failed to appear in court, hindering their ability to present their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissing cases occurred mainly due to insufficient evidence to prove the financial capacity or claims against respondents.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Many cases were dismissed for default arising from plaintiffs failing to pay necessary fees or batta, preventing progression.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default Due to Non-Payment

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?