| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1526 - 1530 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between NISAR. V. P vs CHERIYADATHIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit

FDIA 18/2024 in OS 15/2021

Nadapuram

2025-12-15

approximately-1 year 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ramla vs Subair regarding fixation of boundary, permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No 91/2024

Kerala

2025-12-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KUNHABDULLA vs KUNHALI et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit

OS 64/2021

Kozhikode District

2025-12-17

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Musthafa Kuniyil vs Andru Kuniyil et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit

FDIA 4/2025 in OS 101/2023

Kozhikode District

2025-12-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between THAIPARAMBATH KUNHABDULLA (Died) et al vs E. M. CHANDRAN regarding arrears of rent

Civil Petition

EP 251/2025

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District

2025-12-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support claims or prove the means of the respondents.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiff failed to take necessary legal steps, such as issuing notices to respondents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

The court dismissed cases where the plaintiff was absent, resulting in default.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?