| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1291 - 1295 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Joseph K Cherian vs Hency T et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS No. 458/2022

Kottayam

2025-06-26

approximately-3 years 5 months 26 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between T R Vijayakumar vs Elizabeth regarding U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

S.T.53/2019

Kottayam

2025-06-26

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Kalyanis Ladies Store and Mobile Shop regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS No. 158/2025

Kottayam

2025-06-27

approximately-2 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Ms Arya Rajan et al regarding Suit for realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS No. 97/2022

Kottayam District

2025-06-28

approximately-3 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sumesh P. Kunjumon vs Pramod regarding dishonored cheque

Criminal Case

ST No.167/2013

Kottayam

2025-06-30

approximately-14 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9644

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying the necessary batta for proceedings or notices, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often dismissed for failing to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove defendants' means.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Cases dismissed primarily due to the petitioners' failure to appear in court, resulting in procedural defaults.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs frequently failed as they did not take necessary steps to issue required notices to defending parties.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?