| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1201 - 1205 of 21888

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kurian Abraham et al vs Binu P Mani regarding eviction from a rented property

Rent Control Petition

R.C . P No. 11/2013

KOTTAYAM

2025-09-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Binumon P P vs Gautham Krishna regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 121/2025

Kottayam

2025-09-25

approximately-6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shobha K G vs Kunjumon regarding Compromise Agreement

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 307/2024

Kottayam District

2025-09-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Antony Varghese vs Thomas Mathew regarding Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

S.T. 189/2020

KOTTAYAM

2025-09-29

approximately-5 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muraleedharan T A vs Rani Rajendran regarding specific performance of contract

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 600/2020

Kottayam

2025-09-27

approximately-6 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9642

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default for Non-Payment of Batta

Numerous petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to pay the requisite court fees.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present sufficient evidence supporting their claims or the means of the respondents.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Several cases were dismissed due to the absence of the petitioners during court hearings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Many petitions were dismissed for failing to issue required notices to the respondents as per legal requirements.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default for Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?