| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1101 - 1105 of 21886

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Gopi vs Sajumon regarding civil procedure

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 300048/2025

Kottayam

2025-12-17

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Ms Radha cane Furniture et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 159/2025

Kottayam District

2025-12-18

approximately-3 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Mathews and Sons Finance vs Johnychan Mathew et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. 346/2024

Kottayam

2025-12-18

approximately-2 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Mr. Pradeep. P.P et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1/2023

Kottayam

2025-12-18

approximately-6 years 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Nizam P N regarding Suit for realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 376/2025

Kottayam District

2025-12-18

approximately-4 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9642

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Non-Representation at Hearings

Frequent failure to appear or be represented led to dismissals for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take required procedural steps, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation at Hearings

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?