| Niyamam AI

Displaying 86 - 90 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Anilkumar vs Mr. Shaijumon regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

ST 453/2019

KOLLAM

2025-11-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sudheesh Kumar T.S vs Subhadra regarding Recovery of Money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 757/2023

Kollam

2025-11-29

approximately-3 years 20 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ignatius Joseph et al vs Pradeep et al regarding Execution Petition.

Execution Petition

OS No.464/2021

Kollam

2025-11-29

approximately-4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The South Indian Bank, Ltd vs Aneesh Kumar. B regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 566/2024

Kollam

2025-11-29

approximately-9 years 10 months and 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Reghu. K et al vs Rengan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 601/2020

Kollam

2025-11-29

approximately-5 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiff failed to present necessary evidence to support their claims or prove the means of the respondents.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Petitioner did not pay the required batta, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioner was absent during hearings, resulting in automatic dismissal of the case.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Lack of Necessary Steps

Petitioner failed to take essential procedural steps, such as issuing notices or filing required documents.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?