| Niyamam AI

Displaying 76 - 80 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Somarajan. P vs Remani et al regarding declaration of easement by grant and injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 402/2019

Kollam

2025-11-26

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sugathan vs Shyama et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 14/2025

Kollam

2025-11-26

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Simi P vs Shibi P regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 45/2021

Kollam

2025-11-27

approximately-4 years 1 month 18 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Lekshmikutty Amma et al vs Sivasankara Pillai et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

OS.No.53/1987

Kollam

2025-11-27

approximately-35 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Shebeer et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 972/2023

Kollam

2025-11-28

approximately-5 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals often resulted from insufficient evidence to support claims regarding the respondent's financial capacity.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to take necessary procedural steps or issue required notices.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Plaintiffs often failed to appear in court, leading to case dismissals due to their absence.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?