| Niyamam AI

Displaying 706 - 710 of 21853

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Prakasan Pillai vs Harikrishnan regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.95/2024

Vaikom

2025-06-27

approximately-1 year 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leelamani et al vs Jagada et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No.76/2023

Vaikom Taluk

2025-06-20

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Shylasree Shaji et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.139/2024

Vaikom

2025-06-28

approximately-1 year 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Mrs.Thankamma K.V regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.168/2023

Vaikom, Kottayam District, Kerala

2025-06-28

approximately-5 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Noby vs Musthafa regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 17/2021

Vaikom, Kerala

2025-03-29

approximately-4 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9626

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees for processing their cases, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Several petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to appear during hearings, resulting in default judgments.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to establish their claims, leading to dismissals for lack of proof.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take essential procedural actions, such as issuing notices, resulting in default dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?