| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 6856 - 6860 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kunheema vs Chittappurath Sulaiman et al regarding money suit

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL PETITION (INDIGENT) NO. 9 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-03-14

2 years 11 months 21 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunheema et al vs Chittappurath et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 44 OF 20 15

Tirur

2018-03-14

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Kalam Asad vs Sulaiman. C regarding eviction and realization of arrears of rent.

Original Suit

Original Suit No. 69 OF 2015

Tirur

2019-08-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pathutti et al vs Kadeeja et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 99 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-03-13

2 years 9 months and 5 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Aminu et al vs Mavumkunnath Veedu et al regarding restoration of dismissed partition suit

Civil Suit - Restoration of Dismissed Suit

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1433 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-02-26

2 years 67 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying the required court fees or batta, resulting in default dismissals.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to present sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Dismissals occurred when petitioners failed to appear in court sessions, leading to a default ruling.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or filing documents, causing dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?