| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3221 - 3225 of 15201

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sugathan vs Raghavan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 501/2019

2025-09-29

approximately-6 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.U Shiraz vs A. Abdul Rahim regarding eviction order.

Rent Control Petition

RP. 81/2025 in RCOP. No. 01/2022

Kollam

2025-10-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Branch Manager, Indian Bank vs M/s Iswarya Ayalkkoottam et al regarding review of suit order.

Review Petition

OS. No. 329/2023

Kollam

2025-10-03

approximately-1 year 12 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ajitha Kumary vs Vinu regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 115/2016

Kollam

2025-09-29

approximately-9 years 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Kalyani Santhosh A. et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.240/2024

Kollam

2025-09-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8188

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Non-Production of Documents

Plaintiffs often did not produce necessary documents, resulting in dismissal of their cases.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Pay Costs

Many dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs' failure to pay required court costs or fees.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Dismissals commonly happened when plaintiffs had no legal representation during proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Non-Production of Documents

Failure to Pay Costs

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?