| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3206 - 3210 of 5176

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Secratary vs Muhammed Rasheed et al regarding Execution Proceedings

Execution Proceedings

KLML130010392018

Malappuram

2019-09-30

0 years, 9 months, 9 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Chandran vs K.Sethudamadhavan regarding Restor.Ptn.

Restor.Ptn.

KLML130000652019

Malappuram

2019-09-28

0 years, 8 months, 10 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Pathummakutty vs The Deputy Thahsildar et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 305 OF 2018

Tirur Taluk

2019-09-30

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ali vs Kadiya Umma et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 348 OF 2018

2019-09-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary Ozhur Service Co-operative Bank vs Mambattiyil Kunjukutty et al regarding execution proceeding

Execution Proceeding

KLML130000552018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-09-30

1 years, 9 months, 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

40%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 5,176 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 198 cases)
Commission Report (in 190 cases)
Tax receipt (in 94 cases)
Oral Evidence (in 73 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 56 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2087
Defendant Won: 2566

2566

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Plaintiffs often failed to appear in court, leading to dismissal for default or lack of representation.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs did not provide required documents to support their claims during hearings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs or Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary costs or fees, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Inaction or Lack of Representation

Dismissals arose from plaintiffs not taking necessary actions or having no legal representation present.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Non-Payment of Costs or Fees

Inaction or Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?