| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1546 - 1550 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ouseph @ Santhosh et al vs Stella Victo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Counter Claim

OS. No.1379/2014

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Subaida et al regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of possession.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1940/2013

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bindu vs Jayakumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No.1475/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-31

approximately-2 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions

Civil Suit

OS.No.1065/2017

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-31

approximately-7 years 10 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Santhosh Kumar regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1190/2018

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-01-31

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Multiple cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff or lack of representation during hearings.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Required Evidence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present necessary evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs and Fees

Several petitions were dismissed for not paying necessary court costs or fees required during the proceedings.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Lack of Documentation

Plaintiffs often failed to supply essential documents needed to substantiate their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Produce Required Evidence

Non-Payment of Costs and Fees

Default Due to Lack of Documentation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?