| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1471 - 1475 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sreekala V. vs Ratheesh L., Gireesh L., Girija regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.667/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-02-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Prameela vs Muraleedharan, Vijayabanu, Indira regarding a compromise agreement

Civil Suit

OS.No.574/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-03

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Selvaraj et al vs Gopakumar et al regarding setting aside Commission Report

Civil Suit

OS.No.25/2020

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-02-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.Vinod kumar vs S.Sunil kumar regarding perpetual and mandatory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No.1042/2020

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-05

approximately-4 years 7 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Mallika et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.1866/2019

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-02-06

approximately-5 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Appear in Court

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear, resulting in petitions being dismissed for default due to their absence.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Necessary Documentation

Many plaintiffs did not produce required documents, leading to dismissals for failure to substantiate their claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Several cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not paying necessary fees for processing their petitions.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Inaction or Lack of Representation

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs did not take steps to advance their cases or had no representation in court.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Appear in Court

Lack of Necessary Documentation

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Inaction or Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?