| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13861 - 13865 of 15096

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secratary vs Shahul Hameed regarding enforcement proceedings.

Enforcement Proceedings

EP 308/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-07

0 years, 1 months, 26 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jahfar vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Pattambi et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 295 OF 2016

Tirur

2019-02-08

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between C Alikutty vs Muhammed Fajish regarding offence under N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:34/2018

Tirur

2019-02-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thottivalappil Muhammedkutty vs Paramban Mariyumma et al regarding settlement of decree.

Execution Petition

EP 109/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-02-14

4 years, 10 months, 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Rafi vs The Vikasana Kuries Limited, Theyyath Mohandas regarding 138 of N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:192/2017

Tirur

2019-02-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8130

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

The plaintiff frequently failed to appear in court or have representation, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 37 cases (37%) High Impact

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often did not provide necessary evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment of Costs

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to pay court costs or deposition fees.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs commonly failed to produce essential documents required by the court, leading to dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Failure to Provide Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment of Costs

Lack of Necessary Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?