| Niyamam AI

Displaying 221 - 225 of 245

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secretary vs M. Krishnan et al regarding Default Judgment

Default Judgment

EP 132/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-27

1 year, 2 months, 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muraleedharanunni vs Narayanan regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 206/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-26

0 years, 5 months, 13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Appunni et al vs Suresh Kumar et al regarding Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 205/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Pathiyil Aboobacker vs Nellikkal Muhammedali regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 179/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Chittakath Karthuveettil Ayisakutty et al vs Kottayil Kunhipocker et al regarding cost payment

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 278/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-06-23

0 years, 5 months, 19 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

59%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 245 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 0.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 2%

Common Winning Factors:

Unknown (in 2 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 144
Defendant Won: 58

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36.2%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees or costs, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 21 cases (36.2%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Many plaintiffs did not appear in court, resulting in dismissals due to absence and lack of representation.

Found in 15 cases (25.9%) Medium Impact

Failure to Present Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to provide necessary documents as evidence, leading to judgment dismissals.

Found in 10 cases (17.2%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs frequently failed to issue mandatory notices to respondents, resulting in dismissals for procedural defaults.

Found in 9 cases (15.5%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Representation

Failure to Present Documents

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?