| Niyamam AI

Displaying 171 - 175 of 245

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between P.Moossa et al vs Pandapulakkal Nafeesa Hajjumma et al regarding decree set aside

Restor.P - Decree Set Aside

Restor.P 3394/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-04-10

0 years, 4 months, 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition

Civil Suit - Restoration petition

Restor.Ptn 3408/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-04-09

0 years, 4 months, 13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Moidu vs Vasudevan Nair et al regarding restoration of suit

Civil Suit

Restor. 3445/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-04-09

0 years, 3 months, 30 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Valiya veettil Abdu vs Muhammedkutty regarding restoration of suit

Civil Suit - Restoration

Restor.Ptr 121/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-03-23

0 years, 2 months, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thirunavaya Grama Panchayath vs Mujeeb.P regarding restoration of decree

Restoration Petition

Restor.Pt 2409/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-02-28

0 years, 6 months, 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

59%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 245 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 0.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 2%

Common Winning Factors:

Unknown (in 2 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 144
Defendant Won: 58

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

48.28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Plaintiffs consistently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (48.28%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence or lack of legal representation.

Found in 21 cases (36.21%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to provide necessary documentation required for their cases.

Found in 10 cases (17.24%) Medium Impact

Default in Issuance of Notices

Failure to issue proper notices to respondents led to dismissals of multiple cases.

Found in 5 cases (8.62%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Lack of Representation

Failure to Produce Documents

Default in Issuance of Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?