| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 106 - 110 of 573

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Secratary Perumanna Kalri Service Sahakarn Bank No.F.770 vs Naseer Poomadathil et al regarding default enquiry

Execution Petition

EP 107/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-10

0 years 8 months 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary perumanna Klari Service Sahakaran Bank No.F.770 vs Kunhimarakkar Poozithara regarding default on enquiry

Civil Suit - Execution Petition

EP 108/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-10

0 years, 8 months, 28 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary Perumanna Klari Service Sahakaran Bank LimitedNo.F.770 vs Chandran Kaalan regarding loan satisfaction

Execution Petition

EP 109/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-10

0 years, 8 months, 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Indian Overseas Bank et al vs Shajimol Antony regarding settlement

Execution Petition

EP 200/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-10

0 years, 4 months, 22 days

Consensual settlement

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Fathima regarding EP 112/2016

Execution Petition (EP)

EP 112/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-01-08

1 year, 8 months, 27 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 573 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Unknown (in 4 cases)
Possession Certificate (in 3 cases)
Loan documents (in 2 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 2 cases)
Residential/Ownership Certificate (in 2 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 304
Defendant Won: 178

178

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

33%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 33 cases (33%) High Impact

Default in Payment of Batta

Cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not pay necessary fees for issuing notices or pursuing actions.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Serve Notice

Dismissing cases due to plaintiffs' failure to properly serve notices to defendants as required.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation of Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs failed to appear in court or lacked representation, resulting in automatic dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default in Payment of Batta

Failure to Serve Notice

Non-Representation of Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?