| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 511 - 515 of 573

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Roy Jenson Puthiyedath regarding default judgment

Execution Proceeding

EP 245/2012

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-02-25

1 year, 8 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Moideenkutty et al regarding default in payment

Execution Proceedings

EP 243/2012

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-02-25

1 year, 8 months, 3 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Kothatt Abdulla vs Vijayakumari et al regarding default judgment

Execution Proceeding

EP 438/2012

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-02-25

1 year, 3 months, 11 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Vadakkumpat Padikkal Velayudhan et al regarding debt settlement

Execution Petition

EP 189/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-02-22

0 years, 6 months, 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Sameer Kaduvakkencheri et al regarding payment

Execution Petition

EP 352/2012

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-02-22

1 year, 5 months, 2 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 573 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Unknown (in 4 cases)
Possession Certificate (in 3 cases)
Loan documents (in 2 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 2 cases)
Residential/Ownership Certificate (in 2 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 304
Defendant Won: 178

178

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

33%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 33 cases (33%) High Impact

Default in Payment of Batta

Cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not pay necessary fees for issuing notices or pursuing actions.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Serve Notice

Dismissing cases due to plaintiffs' failure to properly serve notices to defendants as required.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation of Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs failed to appear in court or lacked representation, resulting in automatic dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Evidence Presented

Default in Payment of Batta

Failure to Serve Notice

Non-Representation of Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?