| Niyamam AI

Displaying 41 - 45 of 495

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Manoharan.R. vs Thampi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O S 115/2022

Vaikom Taluk

2025-03-26

approximately-2 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mathanam Kochamgrackal Padasekhara Samithi vs Sathyan.K. et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 62/2023

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam

2025-01-13

approximately-1 year 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vijayasree vs Thyagarajan regarding injunction

Civil Suit

O S 13/2024

Vaikom Taluk

2025-02-18

approximately-1 year 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thomas Mathew K. vs State of Kerala et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. 107/2023

Kanjirappally

2025-10-31

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kurias Thomas et al vs Chacko Sajive regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S 218/2023

Kanjirappally

2025-08-27

approximately-3 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

55%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the outright absence of the plaintiffs during hearings or trials.

Found in 55 cases (55%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs frequently failed to supply sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press Case

Several cases were dismissed because plaintiffs or their counsel did not actively pursue the case.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs often faced dismissal due to failure to pay necessary court fees or costs associated with filing.

Found in 8 cases (8%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Press Case

Non-Payment of Required Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?