| Niyamam AI

Displaying 401 - 405 of 753

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Biji.R vs Sheeja regarding specific performance

Civil Suit

OS. No.338/2018

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-01-31

approximately-7 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mohammed Sheffik vs Murali Menon et al regarding declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.82/2019

2023-02-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between David vs Baby, Kunjamma regarding mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.45/2018

2023-07-31

approximately-5 years 1 month 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Saranya Rajesh vs Yesodha Mani @ Manju et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS No. 33 / 2016

2024-09-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leela Chandran et al vs Karthyayaniyamma et al regarding declaration of rights over property

Civil Suit

OS No. 04 / 2018

Kolenchery

2024-12-20

approximately-6 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

195

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiffs often could not demonstrate ownership of the property in dispute, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs' absence at hearings or failures to pursue their claims.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present adequate evidence to support their legal claims or establish rights.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Lack of Jurisdiction or Procedural Errors

Cases were often dismissed due to issues of jurisdiction or improper procedural conduct by the plaintiffs.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Lack of Jurisdiction or Procedural Errors

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?