| Niyamam AI

Displaying 61 - 65 of 752

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Nizarudeen vs Oseela Beevi et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction.

Civil Suit

OS.No. 110/2020

Kollam

2025-08-26

approximately-5 years 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajendramany et al vs Secretary, Corporation, Kollam regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 641/2014

Kollam, Kerala, India

2025-08-27

approximately-11 years 3 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s.Girija Jayapal vs Dhanapal Sreedharan regarding Declaration and Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 57/2025

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jalaja vs Vijaya Kumar et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Civil Suit

OS.No. 1162/2015

Kollam Taluk

2025-06-27

approximately-10 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunjumol vs The Kollam Corporation et al regarding permanent injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 416/2022

Kollam

2025-06-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

195

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiffs often failed to establish ownership over the disputed property, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs, leading to a lack of representation during hearings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs frequently lacked sufficient documentation or evidence to support their claims, causing dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Non-Maintainable Claims

Several suits were dismissed because they were found to be non-maintainable under relevant laws or procedures.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Absence in Court

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Maintainable Claims

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?