| Niyamam AI

Displaying 566 - 570 of 752

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between St. Sebastian Kurishu Pally, Idavoor et al vs Suja John et al regarding water channel obstruction and easement rights

Counterclaim

O.S. No. 103/2022

Perumbavoor

2025-06-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jose vs Kochumon @ Santhosh et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O. S. No.410/2015

Perumbavoor

2025-06-09

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K V George et al vs Mariyamma et al regarding partition and injunction

Civil Suit

O. S. No.395/2004

2025-06-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Danial Varghese et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding declaration of title and mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

O. S. No.55/2014

Perumbavoor, Kerala

2025-06-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sheela V vs Anitha V et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

O. S. No.233/2018

Perumbavoor

2025-07-25

7 years 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

195

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiffs often failed to demonstrate legal ownership of the disputed property, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Lack of adequate evidence supporting claims, such as ownership or rights, frequently resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Several cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs being absent during hearings, affecting their chances of success.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Compliance with Legal Procedures

Plaintiffs often failed to follow legal procedures or meet necessary requirements, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Non-Compliance with Legal Procedures

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?