| Niyamam AI

Displaying 526 - 530 of 752

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Lilly Alexander et al vs Thankachan regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.509/2012

Ernakulam

2025-05-19

approximately-12 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sharmila @ Sharmi vs Vinsa Paul et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 503 /2018

Ernakulam

2025-05-19

approximately-7 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sharmila @ Sharmi vs Vinsa Paul et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 503/2018

Ernakulam

2025-05-19

approximately-7 years 3 months 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Samad vs P.M.Mirsad et al regarding interim injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 167/2025

Cochin

2025-05-19

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sree Khandakarna – Bhadrakaali Kshethra Kshema Karma Samithi et al vs Mukundan et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 216/2025

Ernakulam

2025-05-22

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

195

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiffs consistently failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove their ownership of the disputed property.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs were unable to present adequate evidence to support their claims or establish necessary legal grounds.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Absence or Default by Plaintiffs

The suits were dismissed frequently due to the plaintiffs being absent during hearings or failing to actively pursue their claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Inability to Establish Prima Facie Case

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs could not establish a prima facie case for the reliefs sought.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Absence or Default by Plaintiffs

Inability to Establish Prima Facie Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?