| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 346 - 350 of 744

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Muhammedkutty vs Komu regarding eviction of tenant

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 24 OF 2016

Tirur

2019-08-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammedkutty vs Komu regarding eviction of tenant

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 25 OF 2016

Tirur

2019-08-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Safiya et al vs The Secretary, Department of Posts et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Rent Control Petition

RCP 85/2016

Tirur

2019-08-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Erachampatt Haseena vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction of shop rooms.

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 51 OF 2016

Tirur

2019-08-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Erachampatt Raseena vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction due to bona fide need.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 81/2016

Tirur

2019-08-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

79%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 744 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 103 cases)
Commission Report (in 97 cases)
Lawyer's Notice (in 94 cases)
Postal receipt (in 79 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 77 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 591
Defendant Won: 126

126

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Plaintiffs often failed due to their absence and lack of legal representation during hearings.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Many cases were dismissed as petitioners chose not to press their petitions during hearings.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Essential Elements

Plaintiffs commonly failed to prove crucial elements, such as landlord-tenant relationships or statutory grounds.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Default and Non-Compliance

Cases were dismissed due to defaults or failures to comply with court directives and statutory requirements.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed

Failure to Prove Essential Elements

Default and Non-Compliance

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?