| Niyamam AI

Displaying 301 - 305 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Baby Girija vs Gopalakrishnan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Counter Claim

COUNTER CLAIM . No. 144/2018

Varkala

2025-06-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Farooq vs Adnan et al regarding temporary injunction against eviction

Injunction

OS NO. 279/ 2024

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-01-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Harihara Suthan et al vs S.Ayyan Perumal regarding possession of property

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P.No 115/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-12-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jayasree Harikumar vs Prageeth.P.G regarding payment or deposit of arrears of rent

Rental Control

RCP.35/2025

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-12-04

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dr. Radha Devi C.V. vs M/s. MAK and DEK regarding eviction and rent adjustment.

Rent Control Petition

OP (RCP). No.87/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-12-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Representation or Absence

Many petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence or lack of representation during hearings.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Numerous cases were dismissed because the petitioners or their counsels chose not to press the petitions.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Case

Plaintiffs often failed to prove their cases with sufficient evidence to establish their claims.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Technical Deficiencies in Filings

Dismissals frequently occurred due to technical issues like improper document submission or non-compliance with court requirements.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Representation or Absence

Petition Not Pressed

Failure to Prove Case

Technical Deficiencies in Filings

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?