| Niyamam AI

Displaying 281 - 285 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Pazhayathoppil Abdu Samad et al vs Saifuddin A. Dhorajiwala et al regarding rent control and fair rent fixation

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.178/2018

Kozhikode

2025-03-25

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Madathil Amina vs Abdul Latheef et al regarding eviction under Section 11 of the Kerala Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act 1965.

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 97/2023

KOZHIKODE

2025-03-25

approximately-1 year 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pazhayathoppil Abdu samad et al vs Saifuddin.A.Dhorajiwala et al regarding fair rent fixation

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 178/2018

Kozhikode District

2025-03-25

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chakkalathop Puthiya Purayil Sareena vs K.T.Abdu Raheem regarding eviction of scheduled premises under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act 1965.

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 40/2020.

KOZHIKODE

2025-03-26

approximately-4 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mohammed Ashraf et al vs Shihabudeen T. regarding eviction from rental property

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 77/2023

KOZHIKODE

2025-03-29

approximately-3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court or have representation, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Case Not Pressed by Plaintiff

Numerous petitions were dismissed because they were not pressed by the petitioner's counsel.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Lack of Sufficient Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present adequate evidence or proof to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Jurisdictional Issues

Some cases were dismissed due to the court lacking jurisdiction over the eviction claims presented.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Case Not Pressed by Plaintiff

Lack of Sufficient Evidence

Jurisdictional Issues

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?