| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 271 - 275 of 744

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between M. D Antony vs M/s. Indus Towers Ltd. regarding recovery of possession and arrears of rent

Civil Suit

O.S No. 140/2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Omana Charly et al vs Judy Xavier regarding eviction

Rental Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 178/2021

Ernakulam

2025-03-10

approximately-3 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Maniamkot Advertisement Company vs Joseph K.L, Antony C John regarding realization of rent arrears

Civil Suit

O.S No. 965/2020

Ernakulam

2025-03-11

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Radhika vs Sini Shiju regarding eviction of tenant

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 179/2022

Ernakulam

2025-03-12

approximately-2 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ms. Mini Derbel vs Molly A. regarding Rent control petition.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 151/2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

79%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 744 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 103 cases)
Commission Report (in 97 cases)
Lawyer's Notice (in 94 cases)
Postal receipt (in 79 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 77 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 591
Defendant Won: 126

126

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

39%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear or lacked representation, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 39 cases (39%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Cases where the plaintiff's counsel chose not to press the petition resulted in dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Inability to Prove Key Elements

Plaintiffs often failed to establish critical elements like tenancy or entitlement, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Lack of Required Evidence

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not providing necessary evidence or documentation to support their claims.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Inability to Prove Key Elements

Lack of Required Evidence

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?