| Niyamam AI

Displaying 196 - 200 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between P. Ahamed Saidu Muhammed et al vs P. Koyakutty et al regarding eviction of respondents from petition schedule property

Rent Control Petition

R C P No.49/2021

Kozhikode

2025-01-23

approximately-7 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between A.T.Ummushereefa vs Drishya.K.T regarding mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 834/2023

Kozhikode District

2025-01-24

approximately-3 years 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K.E. Hussainkutty vs Sasidharan.E.K regarding eviction of respondent from petition schedule shop room.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P 42/2024

Kozhikode

2025-01-24

approximately-1 year 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mrs. Parvathy Rabindranathan et al vs Hassan.K et al regarding eviction of tenants

Rent Control Petition

R C P No.28/2016

KOZHIKODE

2025-01-28

approximately-8 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between T.K.Chidanand vs Shahabas regarding mandatory injunction and licence fee arrears.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 729/2019

Kozhikode

2025-01-28

approximately-5 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

46%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear or had no legal representation during hearings, leading to dismissals.

Found in 46 cases (46%) High Impact

Failure to Press the Petition

Multiple cases were dismissed as the plaintiffs' counsel chose not to press the petitions for various reasons.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Inadequate Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissal of their cases.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Lack of Jurisdiction or Proper Ground

Cases were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or failure to establish bonafide need for eviction or arrears.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Failure to Press the Petition

Inadequate Evidence Provided

Lack of Jurisdiction or Proper Ground

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?