| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 166 - 170 of 744

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between E. K. Antony vs P.S. Baiju regarding rent control

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 133/2022

Ernakulam

2025-10-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between T.K. Mathew @ Kunjukunju Mathew vs K.A. Bharathan regarding eviction of tenant

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 145/2023

Ernakulam

2025-10-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dr. P.K.Abdul Ghafoor memorial MES Cultural Complex vs Mr.V.A.Haris regarding rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 165/2023

ERNAKULAM

2025-10-22

approximately-2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aadil Manzur Arampulickal vs George Kurian Arikody regarding eviction

Eviction Petition

R.C.P. No. 167/2024

Ernakulam

2025-10-23

approximately-1 year 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Faisal S.H. vs Abdul Hameed et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 910/2025

Ernakulam

2025-10-23

approximately-5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

79%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 744 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 103 cases)
Commission Report (in 97 cases)
Lawyer's Notice (in 94 cases)
Postal receipt (in 79 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 77 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 591
Defendant Won: 126

126

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiffs were frequently absent during hearings, leading to dismissals for default without representation.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Not Pressed by Counsel

Many petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs' counsels decided not to press the cases or failed to represent their clients.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence or documentation to support their claims or establish legal grounds.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Failure to Comply with Procedures

Dismissals frequently occurred due to non-compliance with court procedures, including filing issues and not paying necessary fees.

Found in 9 cases (9%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Not Pressed by Counsel

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Comply with Procedures

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?