| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 156 - 160 of 744

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between N. Parevathy Manoranjini vs Tino Thomas regarding eviction based on non-payment of rent.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No.186/2020

Ernakulam

2024-01-31

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Parvathy Antharajanam et al vs Muraleedranath regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Eviction Petition

R.C.P. No.125/2020

Ernakulam

2024-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Salam et al vs C.M. Subair regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Eviction Petition

R.C.P. No.26/2020

Ernakulam

2024-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Harikrishnan vs Mejo K.J. regarding eviction from leased property

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No.28/2020

ERNAKULAM

2024-01-31

approximately-4 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Harikrishnan vs Mejo K.J. regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No.29/2020

Ernakulam

2024-01-31

approximately-4 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

79%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 744 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 103 cases)
Commission Report (in 97 cases)
Lawyer's Notice (in 94 cases)
Postal receipt (in 79 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 77 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 591
Defendant Won: 126

126

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Plaintiff was frequently absent during hearings without any legal representation, leading to dismissals.

Found in 37 cases (37%) High Impact

Failure to Press or Prosecute Case

Plaintiffs often did not press their petitions, resulting in dismissals for lack of action or urgency.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Claims

Plaintiffs consistently failed to provide sufficient evidence or prove their case, leading to dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Jurisdictional Issues

Some cases were dismissed due to the court lacking jurisdiction to hear the claims presented.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Failure to Press or Prosecute Case

Failure to Prove Claims

Jurisdictional Issues

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?