| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 136 - 140 of 744

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Rasak.N.A. vs Shahul Hameed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No.980/2019

Ernakulam

2024-02-29

approximately-4 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Harikrishnan vs Mejo K.J. regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Eviction Petition

R.C.P. No. 27/2020

Ernakulam

2024-02-29

approximately-4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mrs. Usha Jyothish Kumar vs Mrs. Bindhu Vimal regarding eviction from leased property

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 33/2023

ERNAKULAM

2024-02-29

approximately-1 year 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between R. Rajesh Prabhu vs Edna Correya et al regarding eviction under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 80/2022

Ernakulam

2024-02-29

approximately-5 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Narayanan K.C. vs Deepa Benny regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 136/2021

Ernakulam

2024-02-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

79%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 744 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 103 cases)
Commission Report (in 97 cases)
Lawyer's Notice (in 94 cases)
Postal receipt (in 79 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 77 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 591
Defendant Won: 126

126

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Frequent dismissal due to the plaintiff's absence or lack of legal representation during hearings.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Cases dismissed because the petition was not pressed, often signaling lack of interest or readiness.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Claims

Plaintiffs regularly failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or establish legal rights.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Improper Filing or Valuation Issues

Dismissals occurred due to improper documentation, like failure to pay necessary court fees or correct valuations.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Failure to Prove Claims

Improper Filing or Valuation Issues

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?