| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1011 - 1015 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Illathparambil Moidheenkutty's children vs Biyyakkutty Umma et al regarding eviction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 466 OF 2014

2019-10-21

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Enthu vs Mohamed Shafi regarding eviction, damages and rent arrears.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 159 OF 2019

Tirur

2019-09-26

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Shihabudheen vs Shaji regarding rent control

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 37 OF 2018

2019-07-02

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.K.Hamzakutty et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding possession of property

Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition No. 6 of 2011

Tirur Taluk

2019-07-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.K.Hamzakutty et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 8 OF 2011

Tirur

2019-07-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

33%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Representation

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide representation during hearings, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 33 cases (33%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Numerous cases were dismissed because the petitioners decided not to press their petitions, reflecting a lack of commitment.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Frequent dismissals occurred due to the plaintiffs' absence during court proceedings, leading to defaults.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Case

Plaintiffs often struggled to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Representation

Petition Not Pressed

Absence of the Plaintiff

Failure to Prove Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?