| Niyamam AI

Displaying 916 - 920 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Varghese Nettikadan et al vs K.N. Dipu Menon regarding rent control

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 86/2020

Ernakulam

2024-06-24

approximately-4 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.M. Abdul Lahir et al vs Society of E-Governance et al regarding eviction petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 142/2022

Ernakulam

2024-05-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sara Abdul Kalam vs M/s. RKN Automotive regarding possession of property

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 173/2022

Ernakulam

2024-04-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mariamma Oommen vs Muhammad Asker regarding withdrawal of rent control petition.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 91/2023

Ernakulam

2024-04-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Rani Jose vs Ranjith Varma regarding arrears of rent

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 105/2023

Ernakulam

2024-03-12

approximately-1 year 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff or their legal representation during hearings.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Several cases were dismissed because the plaintiff's counsel failed to press the petition during proceedings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Demonstrate Evidence

Plaintiffs often could not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Non-compliance with Court Fees

Certain petitions were dismissed for lack of payment of required court fees or improper valuation.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed

Failure to Demonstrate Evidence

Non-compliance with Court Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?