| Niyamam AI

Displaying 806 - 810 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Jose Mathew et al vs K.S. Ninan regarding Rent Control proceedings

Rent Control Petition

RCP. No. 13/2020

KOTTAYAM

2025-11-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jacob Punnen et al vs Medcity International Academy Pvt. Ltd. regarding eviction for arrears of rent.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P No. 8/2023

KOTTAYAM

2025-08-11

approximately-5 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Raju Thomas vs Dr K K Sasidharan regarding execution of possession

Execution Petition

E.P 169/2023

Kottayam

2025-08-19

approximately-2 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between K G Sivaprasad vs Sarala regarding eviction from decree schedule property

Execution Petition

E.P 55/2018

Kottayam

2025-08-26

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Jose Mathew vs Shafi Kurumpelil regarding eviction for arrears of rent.

Rent Control Petition

RCP 14/2024

Kottayam

2025-10-24

approximately-1 year 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to absence during hearings, resulting in dismissals for lack of representation.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Several cases were dismissed as petitioners did not press their petitions or failed to provide necessary instructions to their counsel.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Case or Grounds

Dismissing cases where plaintiffs could not substantiate their claims or provide evidence, leading to dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Jurisdiction

In some cases, courts dismissed petitions for lack of jurisdiction over the matters presented, affecting the plaintiff's claims.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Representation

Petition Not Pressed by Counsel

Failure to Prove Case or Grounds

Lack of Jurisdiction

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?