| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1 - 5 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between K.K. Faizal et al vs Remani Gopalan regarding eviction and restoration of possession.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 110/2006

ERNAKULAM

2026-01-01

approximately-11 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Dheeraj Mathew et al vs Jishnu Muraleedharan regarding rent arrears and eviction.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 188/2025

Ernakulam

2026-01-06

approximately-1 year 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Archdiocese of Verapoly et al vs Paul E Joseph regarding recovery of vacant possession and arrears of rent.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 984/2023

Ernakulam

2026-01-07

approximately-2 years 1 month

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Smt. Radhika vs Sri.Vipin regarding eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 30/2023

Ernakulam

2026-01-14

approximately-1 year 1 month 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.P. Jacob vs Sulabha regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 218/2025

Ernakulam

2026-01-16

approximately-1 year 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
…
Next page
Last page

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear at hearings, resulting in case dismissals due to defaults.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Failure to Press Petition

Several petitions were dismissed as petitioners or their counsel chose not to press the case forward.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Sufficient Evidence

Many plaintiffs failed to provide necessary evidence or proof to substantiate their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Issuance of Costs Due to Absence

In several cases, plaintiffs were dismissed with costs due to their absence and failure to represent their case.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Failure to Press Petition

Lack of Sufficient Evidence

Issuance of Costs Due to Absence

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?