| Niyamam AI

Displaying 396 - 400 of 594

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Haris P. V. vs Narayanan P. P. regarding U/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

ST 94/2024

Nadapuram

2025-07-30

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Prakash M. K. regarding U/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

ST. 91/2024

Nadapuram

2025-08-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Moidu K. P. vs Shyjith E. K. regarding U/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

ST. 37/2024

Nadapuram

2025-08-02

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Biju M. regarding U/s.138 of Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

ST. 36/2024

Nadapuram

2025-08-02

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Sunil Eralott regarding offence under Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

ST. 34/2024

Nadapuram

2025-08-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

342

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

45%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Complaints Withdrawn by Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs withdrew their complaints, leading to the automatic acquittal of the defendants under various sections.

Found in 45 cases (45%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence from Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish their claims, resulting in the acquittal of defendants.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Plaintiffs Failed to Appear

Failures to attend court proceedings by the plaintiffs led to dismissals and acquittals for the defendants.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Inability to Prove Transaction

Plaintiffs could not demonstrate crucial transactions or obligations, leading to defendants' acquittals.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Complaints Withdrawn by Plaintiffs

Lack of Evidence from Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs Failed to Appear

Inability to Prove Transaction

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?