| Niyamam AI

Displaying 256 - 260 of 594

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M. Abdulkhader Haji vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

S.T. 155/2017

Tirur

2019-12-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mohammed Rafi vs Mohammed Shereef regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No: 146/2017

TIRUR

2019-12-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sidhique and Sulaiman regarding dishonoured cheque

Cheque Dishonour - Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:169/2017

Tirur

2018-10-17

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Gafoor vs Mustaffa regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No: 74/2017

Tirur

2018-05-14

5 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Gafoor vs Mustaffa regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No: 103/2017

Tirur

2018-05-14

5 years 11 months 12 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

342

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Withdrawal of Complaint

Multiple cases resulted in acquittal due to complainants withdrawing their complaints, indicating a lack of desire to pursue allegations.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Complainants frequently failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in the defendants' acquittals.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Complainant's Absence

In some instances, dismissals or acquittals occurred due to the complainant's failure to appear in court for trials.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Debt

Complainants often did not establish that the accused owed them a debt, leading to acquittals in cheque dishonour cases.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Withdrawal of Complaint

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Complainant's Absence

Failure to Prove Debt

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?