| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 371 - 375 of 1355

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between UCO Bank vs M/s Bake Factory regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 60 / 2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-30

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between UCO Bank vs M/s S B Agencies regarding money recovery

Civil Suit

O.S No. 241/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P. Jose Ukkru vs M/s. Systematic Industries Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1076/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-31

approximately-2 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Iqubal Zainul Abid Hussain regarding money suit.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1350/2024

Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-07-31

approximately-3 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Abdul Azeez regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 356/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-31

approximately-2 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

83%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,355 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 11%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 193 cases)
Statement of Account (in 187 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 173 cases)
Loan Application (in 128 cases)
Postal receipt (in 101 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1120
Defendant Won: 173

173

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay the required fee, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs being absent during hearings or trials.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases were dismissed due to failure to provide sufficient evidence for claims.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Not Pressed or Inactive Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs failed to push their cases forward, leading to dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Not Pressed or Inactive Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?