Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 87/2025

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs DAVIS MATHEW regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-30
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the plaintiff seeking recovery of an agricultural loan amount from the defendant, DAVIS MATHEW, who defaulted on repayment. The defendant has left India, resulting in the case proceeding ex parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 38,180/- with interest @ 9.85% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendant stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendant stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Supporting Evidence
On a perusal of plaint, proof affidavit and documents the claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendant stands unchallenged and undisputed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KERALA GRAMIN BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
DAVIS MATHEW
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Memorandum of Agreement for Agricultural Term Loans executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank, Statement of Account of Davis Mathew.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Raoof
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Amaya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff bank is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 38,180 with interest.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 38,180 with interest @ 9.85% per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Claim of penal interest of 2% is denied.
Evidence:
The claim of penal interest of 2% is denied as it is against RBI Regulations.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Memorandum of Agreement for Agricultural Term Loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the account details of Davis Mathew with the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs DAVIS MATHEW regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs DAVIS MATHEW regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 06/23/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JITHIN RAJ. K. T. K, RAJAN. K. T. K regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs MUNEER. K. V regarding recovery of loan amount.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MOLLY regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs JAGATH CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won