| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 336 - 340 of 1355

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between KARE Chemicals, Arun Kumar vs Xoplus Cleaning Solution, Noushad Kinalur regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 892/2023

Ernakulam

2025-08-20

approximately-4 years 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Future Marketting Company vs Electro-Tech regarding money due

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1090/2024

2025-08-20

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between N.M. Balakrishnan vs AHS Enterprises regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 336/2021

Ernakulam

2025-08-21

approximately-8 years 3 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Osseous Health Care Pvt Ltd vs The Superintendent, General Hospital et al regarding Recovery of Money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 162/2019

ERNAKULAM

2025-08-21

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Samanyu Sanathanan vs M/s Codea Technologies Pvt. Ltd. regarding realization of salary

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 915/2021

Ernakulam

2025-08-22

approximately-4 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

83%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,355 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 11%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 193 cases)
Statement of Account (in 187 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 173 cases)
Loan Application (in 128 cases)
Postal receipt (in 101 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1120
Defendant Won: 173

173

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

12%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Court Fees

Plaintiffs consistently failed to produce the necessary court fees or balance fees required for proceeding.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Judgments were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence during hearings or trials, failing to represent their case.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, particularly relating to the means of defendants.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Default in Payment of Batta

Petitions were dismissed for failure to pay required batta fees, hindering the progression of cases.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Court Fees

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence

Default in Payment of Batta

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?