| Niyamam AI

Displaying 336 - 340 of 2442

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/S Mathew and sons Finance vs Sreenivasan Nair K.S et al regarding recovery of loan amount.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 65/2025

Kottayam

2025-03-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abraham Benchamin vs M/s Anjali Traders et al regarding recovery of money as arrears of rent.

Civil Suit

O.S. 225/2023

Kottayam

2025-03-29

approximately-6 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Mathew and Sons Finance vs K. Sarumma et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Civil Suit

O.S No.375/2024

Kottayam

2025-03-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd vs Marit Mahima Mathew et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.293/2024

Kottayam

2025-02-04

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between U C O Bank vs Restin K Mathew regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 69/2024

Kottayam

2025-02-12

approximately-2 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Numerous cases were dismissed as plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta for proceeding with their petitions.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Many cases were dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear or provide representation during hearings.

Found in 26 cases (26%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence of Means

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence showing that the defendants had the means to pay debts.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

A significant number of cases were dismissed as plaintiffs or their counsel did not press their claims.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence of Means

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?