Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 266 - 270 of 672

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Velayudhan Thekinkattil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit

EP 63/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

0 years 3 months 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Velayudhan Thekinkattil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit - Declaration

EP/66/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

0 years, 3 months, 1 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Vettem Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Abdurahiman regarding payment dispute

Civil Suit - Payment Dispute

EP 366/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

1 year, 8 months, 7 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Velayudhan Thekinkattil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit

EP 56/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-02

0 years, 3 months, 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Mahesh.P. P regarding loan recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 194 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-02-28

1 year 10 months 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

71%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 672 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 22%

Common Winning Factors:

Agreement (in 34 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 33 cases)
Loan Application (in 28 cases)
Acknowledgment of Debt and Security (in 23 cases)
Statement of Accounts (in 20 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 477
Defendant Won: 133

133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees or batta, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Multiple cases dismissed due to plaintiffs' absence during hearings, indicating lack of engagement.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Lack of adequate evidence to support claims led to several case dismissals by the court.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Failure to Follow Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs' failure to take required procedural actions resulted in default dismissals in numerous cases.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Failure to Follow Procedural Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?