Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 251 - 255 of 672

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Dharmman vs Thandalam Valappil Sakkariya regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 404 OF 2013

Tirur

2017-06-29

4 years 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary of Kurumbathur Serveice Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs P.Abdul bari, K.Abdul Azeez, M.Suresh Kumar regarding debt recovery

Execution Petition - Debt Recovery

EP 57/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-29

1 year, 4 months, 30 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yogakshemam Loans Ltd. vs Noorul Hassan regarding debt satisfaction

Civil Suit - Debt Satisfaction

EP 95/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-17

0 years, 2 months, 13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Chathappan and Viswanathan regarding debt settlement

Civil Suit - Debt Settlement

EP 327/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-17

1 year, 8 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Edarikode Service Sahakarana Bank vs Palamthodi Mujeeb et al regarding loan closure

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 248/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-16

0 years, 6 months, 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

71%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 672 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 22%

Common Winning Factors:

Agreement (in 34 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 33 cases)
Loan Application (in 28 cases)
Acknowledgment of Debt and Security (in 23 cases)
Statement of Accounts (in 20 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 477
Defendant Won: 133

133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay necessary court fees and costs, resulting in case dismissal for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Plaintiff's Absence or Non-Representation

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence or failure to have representation during hearings.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence of Financial Means

Plaintiffs failed to provide adequate evidence that defendants had the means to pay the decree debt.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Cases were dismissed as plaintiffs or their counsel failed to actively pursue the suit.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff's Absence or Non-Representation

Insufficient Evidence of Financial Means

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?