Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 216 - 220 of 669

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Sudhakaran, V.P. vs Afsal Babu regarding loan repayment dispute

Civil Suit - Recovery of Money

Original Suit No. 69 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-08-21

Approximately 1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between MES College of Engineering vs Dr. Haseena.H regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit - Money Realisation

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 215 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-08-21

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M.Raju vs Suresh regarding money realisation

Civil Suit - Money Realisation

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 218 OF 2016

Tirur, Malappuram District

2017-08-21

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Subhash et al vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding money realisation

Civil Suit - Money Realisation

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 252 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-08-21

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Edarikode Service Sahakarana Bank vs Ummer A Akkara regarding debt satisfaction

Debt Satisfaction

EP 17/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-08-18

0 years, 6 months, 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

71%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 669 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.1 years

Settlement Likelihood 22%

Common Winning Factors:

Agreement (in 33 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 32 cases)
Loan Application (in 28 cases)
Acknowledgment of Debt and Security (in 23 cases)
Statement of Accounts (in 20 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 476
Defendant Won: 133

133

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta, leading to dismissal in multiple cases.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence of Defendants' Means

Many cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence showing the defendants' ability to pay the decreed amount.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Multiple cases were dismissed because the plaintiff was absent during the hearings, affecting their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Non-Pressed Claims by Counsel

Several cases were dismissed as they were not pressed by the plaintiffs' counsel, indicating a lack of pursuit.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence of Defendants' Means

Absence of the Plaintiff

Non-Pressed Claims by Counsel

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?