| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 186 - 190 of 1355

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Union Bank of India vs Mr. Ajith A.K et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 702 of 2023

Ernakulam

2024-03-11

approximately-6 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Cochin Drug House vs Mr. Jose regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.248/2019

Ernakulam

2024-03-07

approximately-5 years 1 month 18 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs M/s. Mannequin Code regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 473 of 2022

Ernakulam

2024-03-07

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbashree Div 5 Nhg 93 Angel et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 66/2024

Ernakulam

2024-03-12

approximately-3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Mahin.P.A. regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.33/2023

Ernakulam

2024-03-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

83%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,355 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 11%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 193 cases)
Statement of Account (in 187 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 173 cases)
Loan Application (in 128 cases)
Postal receipt (in 101 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1120
Defendant Won: 173

173

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff During Hearings

Many cases were dismissed as plaintiffs were absent during critical court hearings, lacking representation.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence of Means to Pay

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating the defendants' financial means to fulfill decrees.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Several suits were dismissed because the plaintiffs or their counsel did not press their claims effectively.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff During Hearings

Lack of Evidence of Means to Pay

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?