| Niyamam AI

Displaying 186 - 190 of 2442

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Smitha Kunjumon et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.171/2024

Vaikom

2025-01-31

approximately-6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs Anjaly Shyladharan et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.86/2023

Vaikom

2025-02-03

approximately-2 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between T.S.Baby vs K.A.Asha regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.71/2021

Vaikom

2025-02-19

approximately-3 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Thomas Ulahannan et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.246/2023

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District

2025-02-28

approximately-6 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Xavier.N.J. vs Jayakumar.P.K. regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS No. 136/2021

Vaikom

2025-02-27

approximately-5 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple cases were dismissed for failing to pay necessary fees like batta to proceed with the case.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Dismissals frequently occurred due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearings or trials.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Cases Not Pressed by Plaintiffs

Several cases were dismissed because the plaintiff’s counsel did not press the suit in court.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Cases Not Pressed by Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?