| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1776 - 1780 of 2442

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ramsiya vs Thunchath Jewellers regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Money Realization

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 85 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-11-25

13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sarojini vs Thunchath Jewellers regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Money Realization

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 380 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-11-25

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Niramarathur Co-operative Bank et al vs Paalamparmabil Abdurahiman et al regarding loan closure

Civil Suit

EP 183/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-21

0 years, 3 months, 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sujatha et al regarding loan recovery

Civil Suit - Recovery of Money

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 45 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-11-18

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri Yogakshema Sabha et al vs Nelson et al regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Realization of Money

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 159 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-10-28

1 year 8 months 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary court fees, resulting in automatic case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during hearings or trial, often leading to default judgments.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence of Means

Plaintiffs failed to present sufficient evidence proving the defendant's means to pay the claimed debts.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Case Not Pressed by Plaintiff

Several cases were dismissed as plaintiffs did not press their claims during hearings, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence of Means

Case Not Pressed by Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?