| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1601 - 1605 of 2446

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Future Marketing Company vs Krimson Agencies regarding money recovery

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1085/2024

2025-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Alex T.P regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 58/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-26

1 year 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s. Reignonline Internet Private Limited et al regarding money realization

Civil Suit

O.S No. 190/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Canara Bank vs Rajasree et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 582/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda et al vs Sulaiman C B et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 741/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Required Evidence

Plaintiffs frequently lacked necessary evidence, particularly regarding the means of respondents to pay debts.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Many petitions were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to pay essential fees, such as court costs or batta.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Cases often got dismissed when plaintiffs did not appear or represent their interests during hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Lack of Action

Numerous cases were dismissed for plaintiffs not taking necessary actions or steps in their petitions.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Required Evidence

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Default Due to Lack of Action

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?